Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Cable Brazil, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that cable television signals are not tangible personal property
• \presumption is raised that the Legislature intended to change the law unless it clearly appears an amendment was made only to express more clearly the original intention of the Legislature\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).