· 4/15/1992
Indiana Department of Human Services v. Firth
Citations
- 1992 WL 73467
- 590 N.E.2d 154
- 1992 Ind. App. LEXIS 482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that we must give effect to the plain and ordinary meaning of a statute's language
- “We presume words appearing in the statute were intended to have meaning and we endeavor to give those words their plain and ordinary meaning absent a clearly manifested purpose to do otherwise.”
- words appearing in a statute intended to have meaning
- statutory language given plain meaning
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Buchanan, Staton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.