Indiana Cobra, Inc. v. UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that threatening language by a protester without evidence that the threat was made “with the intention of compelling [the plaintiff] to accede to [the protestors’] demands as required by the seizure exception to the [LAIA],” rendering section 206d(d) inapplicable
• finding that threatening language by a protester without evidence that the threat was made “with the intention of compelling [the plaintiff] to accede to [the protestors’] demands as required by the seizure exception to the [LAIA],” rendering section 206d(d) inapplicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).