Indiana Cal-Pro, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that employer’s statement that the plant would close in the event of unionization was purely subjective and therefore, not protected by section 8(c)
• finding that past threats of plant closure were particularly persuasive in establishing that a bargaining order was the appropriate remedy
• finding that past threats of plant closure were particularly persuasive in establishing that a bargaining order was the appropriate remedy
• upholding a bargaining order where the Board “relied on the relatively small size of the bargaining unit, the level of management involved, and the extensive and egregious unfair labor practices committed by the Company”
• internal quotation marks given our other holdings. The Board erroneously denied St. and citations omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).