· 3/23/2009
Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc. v. Hardy
Citations
- 618 F. Supp. 2d 936
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24785
- 2009 WL 791288
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In contrast [to a CATT arrangement], ... the cross-connecting CLEC does not have the ability to light or maintain the fibers in its arrangement....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William T. Lawrence
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.