Skip to main content
· 3/23/2009

Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc. v. Hardy

Citations

  • 618 F. Supp. 2d 936
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24785
  • 2009 WL 791288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In contrast [to a CATT arrangement], ... the cross-connecting CLEC does not have the ability to light or maintain the fibers in its arrangement....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William T. Lawrence

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.