Indiana Aeronautics Commission v. Ambassadair, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting contention that the case was essentially a class-of-one claim because the grievance on which the claim was based was common to the whole class
• rejecting contention that the case was essentially a class-of-one claim because the grievance on which the claim was based was common to the whole class
• discerning general legislative objective from several different and even contrary objectives
• discerning general legislative objective from several different and even contrary objectives
• “We conclude that the great deference given to tax legislation and the classifications they may employ by the Fourteenth Amendment and Article I, Section 23 of the Indiana Constitution dictates that this statute is not constitutionally invalid.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).