Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Dixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding past marijuana use, without nexus between current use and threat of harm to the children, was insufficient to support termination of parental rights
• holding past marijuana use, without nexus between current use and threat of harm to the children, was insufficient to support termination of parental rights
• stating that “DHS has the burden to demonstrate a nexus between the allegedly risk-causing conduct and the harm to the child”
• requiring DHS to prove a nexus between the allegedly risk-causing behavior and the harm to the child
• “[ODHS] has the burden to demonstrate a nexus between the allegedly risk-causing conduct and the harm to the child.”
• “[ODHS] has the burden to demonstrate a nexus between the allegedly risk-causing conduct and the harm to the child”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).