Skip to main content
· 6/13/1924

Indian Refining Co. v. Kellar

Citations

  • 203 Ky. 720
  • 263 S.W. 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing a claim based on a violation of Hawaii’s one-to-one ratio requirement where the plaintiffs “d[id] not allege any instance when they were unable to reserve any room of the type they purchased during any week during their designated period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.