· 6/13/1924
Indian Refining Co. v. Kellar
Citations
- 203 Ky. 720
- 263 S.W. 9
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing a claim based on a violation of Hawaii’s one-to-one ratio requirement where the plaintiffs “d[id] not allege any instance when they were unable to reserve any room of the type they purchased during any week during their designated period”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.