Skip to main content
· 2/23/2005

INDIA AMERICA TRADING, CO., INC. v. White

Citations

  • 896 So. 2d 859
  • 2005 WL 419140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a fraudulent inducement claim will not lie where it is nothing more than an action to seek enforcement of an oral contract for the sale of land
  • finding claim for specific performance was unprovable because it was based on an oral contract which was unenforceable under the statute of frauds
  • the statute of frauds applies to a purchase of real property
  • “Pursuant to the statute [of frauds], no action can be brought to enforce a contract for the sale of land unless the contract is in writing and signed by the party to be charged.” (quoting Cavallaro v. Stratford Homes, Inc., 784 So. 2d 619, 621 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepherd, Cortinas, and Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.