Inderrieden v. Phillips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• counsel for appellant present and conferred on court’s response, and appellant informed of the communication prior to the verdict but did not object
• when a trial court’s charge that the State had to provide “reasonable assurance” of the identity of the drugs sold with those tendered into evidence did not change the burden of proof as to chain of custody, a defendant could not show “clear or obvious” error
• when a trial court’s charge that the State had to provide “reasonable 9 assurance” of the identity of the drugs sold with those tendered into evidence did not change the burden of proof as to chain of custody, a defendant could not show “plain or obvious” error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).