Independent Radionic Workers of America v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming Commerce’s decision to prorate advertising expenses that fell outside POI over sales made during that period
• Where the review period covered 4/25/84-3/31/85 and the DOC prorated the month of April advertising expense because Samsung could not provide a daily breakdown of advertising expenses
• “an administrative agency ‘is obliged to deal with a large number of like cases’. . . . [and o]bjecting to [ITA’s] action in the second administrative review at least would have put ITA ‘on notice of the accumulating risk of . . . reversals’ in these multi-issue serial reviews”
• approving Commerce’s new VAT methodology

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).