Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Arvidson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adherence to Claims Administration Statute was irrelevant as policy was null and void from date of inception due to material misrepresentation
• insured waived jury trial as to her counterclaim by filing pretrial statement which included counterclaims as issues to be decided at non-jury trial
• “The Claims Administration Statute was not intended to create coverage under a liability insurance policy that never provided coverage.”
• “An insurer is entitled, as a matter of law, to rely upon the accuracy of the information contained in the application and has no duty to make additional inquiry.”
• “An insurer is entitled, as a matter of law, to rely upon the accuracy of the information contained in the application and has no duty to make additional inquiry.”
• “An insurer is entitled, as a matter of law, to rely upon the accuracy of the information contained in the application and has no duty to make additional inquiry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).