Indamer Corporation v. C. H. Crandon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “defendant consistently sought to inject into the case the fact that the plaintiff had been protected by insurance”
• noting “defendant consistently sought to inject into the case the fact that the plaintiff had been protected by insurance”
• refusal to order a new trial in such circumstances error of law
• “[T]he rule is clear that an order denying a motion for a new trial, in a case where the absolute absence of evidence to support the jury’s verdict makes such refusal an error in law, is subject to review by the appellate courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).