· 10/3/2011
Inda-Lares v. United States
Citations
- 181 L. Ed. 2d 118
- 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7139
- 132 S. Ct. 216
- 565 U.S. 868
- 80 U.S.L.W. 3186
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is not necessary that an express beneficiary be specifically identified in the contract; he may recover on it if he can show that he is one of a class of persons for whose benefit it was made”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.