· 7/1/2021
in the Matter of Z.T.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the Commission has no authority or jurisdiction to “adjudicate questions of title or rights of possession”
- recognizing that the Commission has no authority or jurisdiction to \adjudicate questions of title or rights of possession\
- recognizing that the Commission has no authority or jurisdiction to \adjudicate questions of title or rights of possession\
- stating that the Railroad Commission “does not undertake to adjudicate questions of title or rights of possession”
- stating that the Railroad Commission \does not undertake to adjudicate questions of title or rights of possession\
- “the fact that a [Railroad Commission] permit to drill had been granted would not be admissible in support of permittee’s title”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.