In the Matter of William A. Vincent, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[E]valuating the constitutionality of restrictions on the political speech of a judge does not fit neatly into the existing analytical framework for First Amendment analysis. Selecting the appropriate framework for analysis has become even more difficult since White.”
• “[W]e recognize that there are nevertheless 24 Judicial Misconduct, 632 F.3d 1289, 1289 (9th Cir. Jud. Counc. 2001) (Kozinksi, C.J., sitting alone
• “[W]e recognize that there are nevertheless constitutional limitations on the regulation of judicial speech.”
• “[E] valuating the constitutionality of restrictions on the political speech of a judge does not fit neatly into the existing analytical framework for First Amendment analysis. Selecting the appropriate framework for analysis has become even more difficult since White.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).