Skip to main content
· 3/18/1960

In the Matter of United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, Movant

Citations

  • 276 F.2d 77
  • 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5099
  • 1960 Trade Cas. (CCH) 69,651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[K]nowing of a ground for requesting disqualifica- tion, [a party] can not be permitted to wait and decide whether he likes subsequent treatment that he receives.”
  • “[K]nowing of a ground for requesting disqualifica- tion, [a party] can not be permitted to wait and decide whether he likes subsequent treatment that he receives.”
  • “We cannot permit a litigant to test the mind of a trial judge like a boy testing the temperature of water in the pool with his toe, and if found to his liking, decides to take a plunge.”
  • “One of the reasons for requiring promptness in filing [recusal motions] is that a party knowing of a ground for requesting disqualification, cannot be permitted to wait and decide whether he likes the treatment that he receives.”
  • ‘We cannot permit a litigant to test the mind of the trial judge like a boy testing the temperature of the water in the pool with his toe, and if found to his liking, decides to take a plunge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodbury, Hartigan, Aldrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.