In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. Q.-R. H., Mother AKA B. Q. R. H. AKA B. Q.-R. H. AKA B. Q. R. H. and F....

Syllabus

Appellant-mother and appellant-father challenge the termination of their parental rights. Mother argues that the district court abused its discretion by finding that respondent-county proved three statutory grounds for termination, that the county made reasonable reunification efforts, and that termination was in the child's best interests. Mother also argues that the district court's failure to explain its credibility determinations violated her right to procedural due process. Father argues that he was improperly served and that the district court erred by authorizing a default proceeding against him. We affirm.