In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. M. B., Child

Syllabus

Appellant, a juvenile, challenges his adjudication for second-degree criminal sexual conduct arguing that the district court was biased, that it abused its discretion by admitting the complainant's out-of-court statements, that the cumulative effect of those errors deprived appellant of a fair trial, and that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a stay of adjudication. Appellant also challenges the disposition, arguing that probation conditions prohibiting him from accessing the internet and requiring him to submit to a polygraph are unduly restrictive of his liberty and unconstitutionally overbroad. Because we see no judicial bias, no error, and no abuse of discretion in the adjudication or the disposition, we affirm.