Skip to main content
· 11/17/2014

In the Matter of the Walter Penner Trust Under Agreement Created by the Grantor, Walter Penner on April 13, 2010, Stanley Penner v. Ronald Penner

Citations

  • 22 N.E.3d 593
  • 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 563
  • 2014 WL 6388418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to add to, vary, or explain the terms of a written instrument so long as the terms of the instrument are clear and unambiguous
  • awarding appellee Trust appellate attorney’s fees based on appellant’s procedural violations
  • “A trust instrument’s language is not ambiguous simply because the parties disagree about its meaning; instead, the language of the instrument is ambiguous only if reasonable people could come to different conclusions as to its meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.