In the Matter of the Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of J.C., Et.C. & El.C. S.C. v. Indiana Department of Child Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[r]ecommendations of the case manager . . . in addition to evidence the conditions resulting in removal will not be remedied, are sufficient to show by clear and convincing evidence that termination is in the child’s best interests”
• observing that “[r]ecommendations of the case manager . . . in addition to evidence the conditions resulting in removal will not be remedied, are sufficient to show by clear and convincing evidence that termination is in the child’s best interests”
• observing that “[r]ecommendations of the case manager . . . in addition to evidence the conditions resulting in removal will not be remedied, are sufficient to show by clear and convincing evidence that termination is in the child’s best interests”
• observing that “[r]ecommendations of the case manager . . . in addition to evidence the conditions resulting in removal will not be remedied, are sufficient to show by clear and convincing evidence that termination is in the child’s best interests”
• affirming trial court’s conclusion that there was a satisfactory plan for the care and treatment of the children where the children were in pre-adoptive placement with their paternal grandmother, who had cared for them for approximately one year
• termination of parental rights supported by 6 Despite Mother’s argument to the contrary, the termination of her parental rights is separate from the trial court’s decision regarding Father’s parental rights. See In re J.W., 779 N.E.2d 954, 959 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).