In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: Zachary Steven Skone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \the Supreme Court has found [the] essential mandate” of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause \inherent in the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and therefore applicable to the federal government”
• noting that “every publisher in the country other than [plaintiff] can knock on the FCC’s door and seek the exercise of its discretion to secure” exemptions to restrictions that applied to plaintiff by law
• noting that “every publisher in the country other than [plaintiff] can knock on the FCC’s door and seek the exercise of its discretion to secure” exemptions to restrictions that applied to plaintiff by law
• questioning Congress’s chosen approach to the identified problem of “temporary waivers ‘creeping’ into permanence” and suggesting alternative legislative solutions
• questioning Congress’s chosen approach to the identified problem of “temporary waivers ‘ci-eeping’ into permanence” and suggesting alternative legislative solutions
• questioning Congress's chosen approach to the identified problem of \temporary waivers `creeping' into permanence\ and suggesting alternative legislative solutions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).