Skip to main content
· 9/12/2023

In the Matter of the Marriage of Samantha Yvette Valenzuela and Angel Ezau Valenzuela and in the Interest of S.E v. a Minor Child v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no jury could correctly find the film \Carnal Knowledge\ obscene
  • “Even though questions of appeal to the ‘prurient interest’ or of patent offensiveness are ‘essentially questions of fact,’ it would be a serious misreading of Miller to conclude that juries have unbridled discretion in determining what is ‘patently offensive.’”
  • Brennan, Stewart and Marshall, JJ., concurring

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.