In the Matter of the Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Pedro Archuleta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• must show that exclusion is “substantial and prejudicial” when jury selected in accordance with procedures of the Act
• ‘[s]ome mechanical troubles with a telephone, together with knowledge of a call easily derived from long distance telephone records, is such insubstantial evidence that in most cases it puts no burden on the prosecutor to ‘affirm or deny’ the existence of wiretapping.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).