Skip to main content
· 8/12/1985

In The Matter Of The Complaint Of Sedco, Inc.

Citations

  • 767 F.2d 1140
  • 1986 A.M.C. 706
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Convention was “negotiated pursuant to the Constitution’s [t]reaty power” and made “the highest law of the land” by its enabling legislation
  • district court erroneously refused to stay litigation and compel arbitration although third party joined suit between parties to arbitration agreement
  • “[A]s a general rule, whenever the scope of an arbitration clause is in question, the court should construe the clause in favor of arbitration.”
  • district court erroneously refused to stay litigation and compel arbitration although third party joined suit between parties to arbitration agreement
  • “[a]bsent allegations of fraud in the inducement of the arbitration clause itself, arbitration must proceed when an arbitration clause on its face appears broad enough to encompass the party’s claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.