Skip to main content
· 12/24/1997

Federal Case

Citations

  • 132 F.3d 818
  • 1998 A.M.C. 635
  • 28 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20431
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 36796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that claims under the Oil Pollution -8- Act were not subject to the Limitation Act or Rule F, and thus the claims could be filed in a collateral proceeding without abiding by the procedures set forth in Rule F
  • “‘The OPA imposes strict liability for pollution removal costs and damages on the responsible party for a vessel or a facility from which oil is discharged.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.