Skip to main content
· 12/23/1975

Federal Case

Citations

  • 527 F.2d 211
  • 91 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2077
  • 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dispute over pension provisions referred to arbitration under CBA despite separate arbitration provision in pension plan
  • “This is not an issue of whether there is a contract, but of what the contract requires, and is for the arbitrator.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.