Skip to main content
· 12/6/1999

Federal Case

Citations

  • 198 F.3d 473
  • 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1
  • 2000 A.M.C. 317
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that federal discovery rules typically do not apply to disputes governed by arbitration provisions
  • affirming district court’s order granting Rule 27 petition and allowing petitioner to “inspect the vessel, observe repairs, and copy documents from the ship”
  • affirming district court’s order granting Rule 27 petition and allowing petitioner to “inspect the vessel, observe repairs, and copy documents from the ship”
  • permitting a vessel inspection was not an abuse of discretion where petitioner’s need to perpetuate evidence on the vessel could not “easily be accommodated by other potential evidence”
  • permitting a vessel inspection was not an abuse of discretion where petitioner’s need to perpetuate evidence on the vessel could not “easily be accommodated by other potential evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.