Skip to main content
· 2/12/2014

In the Matter of S.D., Alleged to be a Child in Need of Services J.B. v. Indiana Department of Child Services

Citations

  • 2 N.E.3d 1283
  • 2014 WL 553475
  • 2014 Ind. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the State’s parens patriate intrusion into the ordinarily private sphere of the family is limited
  • recognizing that the State’s parens patriate intrusion into the ordinarily private sphere of the family is limited
  • holding that a closed CHINS case is not moot in part because a CHINS adjudication can result in “relax[ing] the State’s burden for terminating parental rights”
  • holding that a closed CHINS case is not moot in part because a CHINS adjudication can result in “relax[ing] the State’s burden for terminating parental rights”
  • holding that we do not reweigh the evidence or rejudge witness credibility on appeal
  • providing that a CHINS determination could result in adverse job consequences or preclude a parent from serving as a foster parent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rush, Dickson, Rucker, David, Massa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.