In the Matter of: S.A. (Minor Child), Child in Need of Services and M.H. (Father) v. The Indiana Department of Child Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that father’s disclosure that he suffered from PTSD could not provide grounds for continuing child’s adjudication as a CHINS because father’s PTSD was not presented in the CHINS petition as a basis for DCS involvement
• holding fathers PTSD diagnosis did not support CHINS finding where father had béen voluntarily addressing;it and there was no evidence father would need to bé coerced into obtaining additional treatment if necessary
• identifying a violation where the court held a fact-finding hearing but “had already determined” the child was a CHINS in light of the other parent’s admission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).