· 12/4/1995
In the Matter of Robert William Norris and Emily Waller Norris, Debtors. Robert William Norris v. First National Bank in Luling
Citations
- 70 F.3d 27
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33760
- 28 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 268
- 1995 WL 680429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming bankruptcy court’s finding that a financial statement’s “only obvious substantial error . . . was one of which the bank already was aware” and “that the flawed financial statement was ‘not such a ‘red flag’ as to invoke a duty to investigate’”
- “A pro se litigant must be given leave to amend his or her 28 complaint, and some notice of its deficiencies, unless it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment.’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politz, Duhé, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.