In the Matter of R.B., Alleged to Be Seriously Mentally Impaired

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there is no need to undertake a choice-of-law analysis when the parties agree on the source of substantive law
• observing that there is no need to engage in a choice- of-law analysis when the parties agree on the applicable substantive law
• observing that we need not conduct a choice-of-law inquiry when there is no dispute on the applicable substantive law
• observing that we -2- Case No. 22-5828, World Heritage Animal Genomic Resources, Inc., et al. v. Wright, et al. need not conduct a choice-of-law inquiry when there is no dispute on the applicable substantive law
• stating the Court did not need to inquire into choice of law issues when the parties did not dispute that Ohio law applied
• imposing sanctions because the issue on appeal had been “clearly resolved” and the appellant’s arguments “essentially had no reasonable expectation of altering the district court’s judgment based on law or 5 fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).