In the Matter of Peter D. Korn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding evidence inadmissible because it was too far removed and irrelevant to the crime charged
• reversing where “no proof was presented that [defendant] had personal and exclusive dominion and control over the stolen property,” which had not been recently stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).