in the Matter of M.C.H., a Juvenile

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that claims were not anticipated and then considering whether claims would have been obvious
• overturning the Board’s claim construction and then finding claims unpatentable under the proper construction because that was the “only permissible factual finding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).