· 4/27/1992
In the Matter of Marriage of Nuss
Citations
- 828 P.2d 627
- 65 Wash. App. 334
- 15 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1919
- 1992 Wash. App. LEXIS 173
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expressing doubt that a spouse could ever be charged rent for occupying a portion of community real property pending dissolution
- origin of community property as one party’s separate property may be considered as a reason for awarding all or a disproportionate share to that party
- disability benefits which are in the nature of compensation for lost future wages are not an asset for distribution upon dissolution; by contrast, disability benefits which are in the nature of deferred compensation or retirement pay are community property
- disability benefits which are in the nature of compensation for lost future wages are not an asset for distribution upon dissolution; by contrast, disability benefits which are in the nature of deferred compensation or retirement pay are community property
- wife’s Financial Security Plan, which allowed her to bank unused sick leave and receive the dollar value of any unused benefits upon death or retirement, was properly characterized as an asset for distribution in dissolution of marriage action
- wife's Financial Security Plan, which allowed her to bank unused sick leave and receive the dollar value of any unused benefits upon death or retirement, was properly characterized as an asset for distribution in dissolution of marriage action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.