In the Matter of: Lori A. Rexroth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that there is “not . . . a burden on the applicant to establish relocation is not possible”
• stating that 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(3)(ii) “does not mean there is a burden on the applicant to establish relocation is not possible”
• rejecting the immigration judge’s conclusion that the ability to relocate weighed against the petitioner when relocation would have required avoidance of any familial contact
• reviewing 15 questions of law de novo and factual findings for substantial 16 evidence
• granting petition for review where “[t]he IJ and BIA . . . ignored substantial and material evidence that [the applicant] is likely to be killed if removed to [his home country]”
• “[W]e find error in the IJ’s and BIA’s failure to consider the unrebutted expert affidavit of Dr. Harriott, which we assume to be credible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).