In the Matter of Kevin M. Brill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the applicability of the sliding-scale approach is an open question in this Circuit but that failure to show irreparable harm warrants denying a motion for preliminary injunction regardless of the answer to that question
• The “possibility that adequate compensatory or other corrective relief will be available at a later date, in the ordinary course of litigation, weighs heavily against a claim of irreparable harm.” (citation modified)
• “Even under the sliding-scale approach, a movant’s failure to show any irreparable harm is grounds for refusing to issue a preliminary injunction, even if the other three factors merit such relief.” (cleaned up)
• “[A] movant’s failure to show any irreparable harm is grounds for refusing to issue a preliminary injunction, even if the other three factors merit such relief.” (cleaned up) (quoting Chaplaincy, 454 F.3d at 297)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).