Skip to main content
· 3/12/1987

In the Matter of Kenney

Citations

  • 504 N.E.2d 652
  • 399 Mass. 431
  • 1987 Mass. LEXIS 1173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in disciplinary proceeding, that attorney’s financial records regarding client funds were not public documents, but assumed public aspects because they were necessary for attorney to meet statutory and ethical obligations
  • upholding enforcement of a subpoena requiring attorney to produce possibly incriminating “required records”
  • act of producing required records not privileged because the act of doing so is not incriminating
  • \[t]he fundamental requisite of due process is an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner\
  • “[t]he fundamental requisite of due process is an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner”
  • “The fundamental requisite of [procedural] due process is an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Nolan, Lynch, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.