In the Matter of: Kenneth Everett McPherson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that present costs to mitigate risk of crop infection would occur even if crops were never actually infected
• recognizing that plaintiffs whose alleged injuries from agency deregulation had both environmental and economic components fell within the APA and the NEPA's zone of interest
• concluding that plaintiffs were within NEPA’s zone of interests where their alleged injury had both an economic and environmental component
• holding that plaintiffs had standing to challenge an injunction preventing them from planting a regulated crop, even though a decision vacating the injunction would enable plaintiffs only to petition for partial deregulation
• holding that farmers had standing to challenge restrictions on an agency's ability to deregulate a genetically-engineered product even though their ultimate goal of deregulation could not be achieved without further agency action
• holding that farmers had standing to challenge restrictions on an agency’s ability to deregulate a genetically-engineered product even though their ultimate goal of deregulation could not be achieved without further agency action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).