In the Matter of Joseph ANDREUCCETTI and Noemi Andreuccetti, Debtors-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellants “lack[ed] standing to challenge” certain claims because they did not “hold any of [them], nor d[id] they assert” that they were “adversely affected by the plan’s treatment of [them]”
• approving creditors' proposed plan which included settlement of debtor's state law claims against the creditors where bankruptcy court applied similar A & C Properties standard used in Rule 9019 settlements
• debtors had standing to appeal only because of the possibility of a surplus
• debtors had standing to appeal only because of the possibility of a surplus
• debtors had standing to appeal only because of the possibility of a surplus
• debtors had standing to appeal only because of the possibility of a surplus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).