Skip to main content
· 10/31/2017

In the Matter of J.E., L.E., P.E., and A.G. (Minor Children), Children in Need of Services, and C.E. (Father) and A.G. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the Sixth Circuit has adopted the steam of commerce plus theory of specific personal jurisdiction
  • “[A] statement a proponent offers against an opposing party is not hearsay if the opposing party made the statement in an individual or representative capacity.”
  • “for a defendant to purposely avail himself of the privilege of acting within a forum state, he must do more than merely place a product into the stream of commerce”
  • “for a defendant to purposely avail himself of the privilege of acting within a forum state, he must do more than merely place a product into the stream of commerce”
  • “For a defendant to purposely avail himself of the privilege of acting within a forum state, he must do more than merely place a product into the stream of commerce”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.