Skip to main content
· 11/3/1983

In the Matter of James W. MacMeekin Barbara A. MacMeekin Debtors. Lois Burns, Frederick Kuckuck, and Stelmir & Co. v. James W. MacMeekin

Citations

  • 722 F.2d 32
  • 38 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 104
  • 9 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1040
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15565
  • 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that district court’s mere description of counsel’s conduct as “‘inexcusable neglect’” and “a ‘conscious failure to comply’ with discovery” does not adequately provide reviewing court with rationale for lower court’s decision
  • requiring district courts to rule out alternative remedies noting “[t]he brunt of the order [to dismiss] falls on plaintiffs, who have been deprived of the opportunity to litigate their case on the merits, when the only culpable party may well be their attorney”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weis, Higginbotham, Sloviter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.