In the Matter Of: Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that prior Canon 2 (A) was “extremely broad” and had been “attacked as being nebulous and incapable of rational application” before concluding with “no hesitancy” that particular conduct at issue in the case violated rule
• removing justice of the peace who pleaded nolo contendere to assisting relative in fraudulent obtainment of welfare benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).