· 8/10/1976
Federal Case
Citations
- 541 F.2d 373
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that attorney has standing to intervene and challenge subpoena directed at prothonotary on basis of attorney’s claim of privilege
- order denying attorney's motion to quash subpoena to prothonatary for copies of contingent fee agreements is final
- order denying attorney’s motion to quash subpoena to prothonatary for copies of contingent fee agreements is final
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.