Skip to main content
· 8/10/1976

Federal Case

Citations

  • 541 F.2d 373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that attorney has standing to intervene and challenge subpoena directed at prothonotary on basis of attorney’s claim of privilege
  • order denying attorney's motion to quash subpoena to prothonatary for copies of contingent fee agreements is final
  • order denying attorney’s motion to quash subpoena to prothonatary for copies of contingent fee agreements is final

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.