In the Matter of Grand Jury Empanelled March 19, 1980 United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing but not adopting distinction between individual’s personal and business records
• the responding party cannot be compelled to “become, in effect, the primary informant against himself’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).