Skip to main content
· 9/9/2010

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Scannell

Citations

  • 239 P.3d 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a hearing officer who \largely denied\ an attorney's discovery requests did not violate due process
  • recognizing the “self-governing nature of the practice of law”
  • “The record clearly supports this finding. Scannell’s attempts to avoid sub-poenae revealed his intent to delay and frustrate the proceedings.”
  • detailing proceedings before the Supreme Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.