· 9/9/2010
In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Scannell
Citations
- 239 P.3d 332
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a hearing officer who \largely denied\ an attorney's discovery requests did not violate due process
- recognizing the “self-governing nature of the practice of law”
- “The record clearly supports this finding. Scannell’s attempts to avoid sub-poenae revealed his intent to delay and frustrate the proceedings.”
- detailing proceedings before the Supreme Court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stephens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.