In the Matter of: Danielle Ann Oldenburg v. Daniel Frederick Schanze, (A23-1837), ...

Syllabus

In these consolidated appeals from the district court's grant of an order for protection (OFP) to respondent Danielle Ann Oldenburg against appellant Daniel Frederick Schanze and denial of Schanze's petition for an OFP against Oldenburg, Schanze argues that the district court (1) should have admitted and considered certain medical records regarding the parties' child; (2) should have, in its interview of the child, inquired about the allegations of child abuse in Schanze's petition; (3) erred by making a finding of fact based on evidence struck from the record as hearsay; and (4) failed to make adequate findings of fact to support its grant of the OFP. We affirm.