Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting that section 328(a) sets a “high standard”
• “Bankruptcy courts are not authorized by Article III of the Constitution, and as such are not presumptively bound by traditional rules of judicial standing.”
• “Even a claimant to a fund must show a realistic likelihood of injury in order to have standing.”
• “The ‘person aggrieved’ test is an even more exacting standard than traditional constitutional standing.”
• “When [the bankruptcy courts’] fee discretion began to dissuade professionals from offering their services to debtors, Congress passed section 328(a) of the bankruptcy code, which allowed professionals to have greater certainty as to their eventual payment.”
• “When [the bankruptcy court’s fee discretion began to dissuade professionals from offering their services to debtors, Congress passed section 328(a) of the bankruptcy code, which allowed professionals to have greater certainty as to their eventual payment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).