Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering, in applying equitable mootness, “ ‘whether it is prudent to upset the plan of reorganization at this late date’ ”
• equitable mootness \protects the interests of non-adverse third parties who are not before the reviewing court but who have acted in reliance upon the plan as implemented\
• “We must evaluate [actions taken pursuant to the Plan], many of which appear irreversible, against the backdrop of the relief sought-nothing less than a wholesale annihilation of the Plan.”
• \[t]he concept of 'mootness' from a prudential standpoint protects the interests of non-adverse third parties who are not before the reviewing court but who have acted in reliance upon the plan as implemented\
• equitable mootness “protects the interests of non-adverse third parties who are not before the reviewing court but who have acted in reliance upon the plan as implemented”
• “[t]he concept of ‘mootness’ from a prudential standpoint protects the interests of non-adverse third parties who are not before the reviewing court but who have acted in reliance upon the plan as implemented”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).