In the Matter of C.D.T., III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that transfer decisions are reviewed for abuse of discretion, not legal and factual sufficiency, and that trial court does not abuse its discretion so long as some evidence supports its transfer decision
• holding that transfer decisions are reviewed for abuse of discretion, not legal and factual sufficiency, and that trial court does not abuse its discretion so long as some evidence supports its transfer decision
• relying on misconduct while in custody as some evidence supporting trial court’s transfer decision
• relying on misconduct while in custody as some evidence supporting trial court’s transfer decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).